Type to search

Decision to block Apple store in Federation Square ‘reinforces value of public architecture’

Decision to block Apple store in Federation Square ‘reinforces value of public architecture’


The decision by Heritage Victoria to refuse the application to demolish the square’s Yarra Building to make way for a new Apple store has been welcomed by The Australian Institute of Architects.

Heritage Victoria said it had refused the application because it would cause “an unacceptable and irreversible detrimental impact on the cultural heritage significance of Federation Square” as the new building would be visually dominant, detract from the “design language” of the square and diminish the public square, the decision outlined.

In a statement released today, president at Australian Institute of Architects Victorian Chapter, Amy Muir, said the Victorian Government’s subsequent decision to launch a review into Federation Square’s future was very welcome.

“The Institute has been advocating consistently against the Victorian Government’s plans for the future of Federation Square and lack of due process since they were first announced in 2017,” Muir said.

“Our concerns were broad-ranging and we have urged that any change be well-considered, something the original plans were not. We have advocated for the preparation of a considered and coordinated masterplan to ensure any changes to Federation Square are successful in supporting the original intentions for this public asset.

“Federation Square is Victoria’s premier civic and cultural space, representing celebration and public interaction. It is a building of many parts that make a whole, and it is imperative that we resist any tendency to start unpacking and removing parts. This will ultimately have a detrimental impact on the significance of the building and Federation Square precinct.”

Heritage Victoria acknowledged its refusal would have an economic impact, however, noted there was no sufficient evidence the proposed development was needed to ensure the viability of Federation Square as a whole.

“The negative impacts of the proposal are not outweighed by the benefits, including the economic benefits,” it said.

The state government has enlisted government architect Jill Garner and former managing partner of Ernst and Young Tim Eddy to review how Federation Square looks, is funded and operates.



You Might also Like

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *